Rich Text Format vs Plain Text: Which Should You Use?
Side-by-side comparison of Rich Text Format and Plain Text document formats — features, pros, cons, and conversion options.
Rich Text Format is best for Simple formatted documents with maximum compatibility. Plain Text is best for Plain text notes, configuration, and data exchange.
Quick Verdict
- ✓ Cross-platform text formatting
- ✓ No macro security risks
- ✓ Wide application support
- ✗ Limited formatting compared to DOCX
- ✓ Universal compatibility
- ✓ Smallest file size
- ✓ No formatting overhead
- ✗ No formatting
Specs Comparison
Side-by-side technical comparison of Rich Text Format and Plain Text
| Feature | Rich Text Format | Plain Text |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document | Document |
| Year Introduced | 1987 | 1960 |
| MIME Type | application/rtf | text/plain |
| Extensions | .rtf | .txt, .text |
| Formatting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Formulas | ✗ | ✗ |
| Multi Sheet | ✗ | ✗ |
| Images | ✓ | ✗ |
| Editable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Plain Text | ✗ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
Rich Text Format
- ✓ Cross-platform text formatting
- ✓ No macro security risks
- ✓ Wide application support
- ✗ Limited formatting compared to DOCX
- ✗ Larger than plain text
- ✗ No modern features like tracked changes
Plain Text
- ✓ Universal compatibility
- ✓ Smallest file size
- ✓ No formatting overhead
- ✗ No formatting
- ✗ No images or embedded content
- ✗ No metadata
When to Use Each
Choose Rich Text Format when...
- You need files optimized for Simple formatted documents with maximum compatibility
- Cross-platform text formatting
- No macro security risks
Choose Plain Text when...
- You need files optimized for Plain text notes, configuration, and data exchange
- Universal compatibility
- Smallest file size
How to Convert
Convert between Rich Text Format and Plain Text for free on ChangeThisFile
Frequently Asked Questions
Rich Text Format is best for Simple formatted documents with maximum compatibility, while Plain Text is best for Plain text notes, configuration, and data exchange. Both are document formats but they differ in compression, compatibility, and intended use cases.
It depends on your use case. Rich Text Format is better for Simple formatted documents with maximum compatibility. Plain Text is better for Plain text notes, configuration, and data exchange. Consider your specific requirements when choosing between them.
Go to the Rich Text Format to Plain Text converter on ChangeThisFile. Upload your file and the conversion processes on the server, then auto-deletes. It's free with no signup required.
Yes. ChangeThisFile supports Plain Text to Rich Text Format conversion. Upload your file for server-side conversion — files are auto-deleted after processing.
File size varies depending on the content, compression method, and quality settings of each format. In general, lossy formats produce smaller files than lossless ones. Test with your specific files to compare actual sizes.
Yes, Rich Text Format supports formatting, but Plain Text does not. This may be important depending on your use case.
Both Rich Text Format and Plain Text are supported file formats that are free to use. You can convert between them for free on ChangeThisFile — server-side conversions are free with no signup required.
Rich Text Format is newer — it was introduced in 1987, while Plain Text dates back to 1960. Newer formats often offer better compression and features, but older formats tend to have wider compatibility.
Related Comparisons
Related Guides
Ready to convert?
Convert between Rich Text Format and Plain Text instantly — free, no signup required.
Start Converting